MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540395161 · doi:10.1109/icc.2001.936634

Tail probabilities for the multiplexing of fractional α-stable broadband traffic

2002· article· en· W1540395161 on OpenAlexaff
Fotios Harmantzis, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, I. Katzela

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatistical time division multiplexingComputer networkComputer scienceQueueing theoryMultiplexingBroadband networksBroadbandInternet trafficTraffic generation modelInternet traffic engineeringTraffic shapingMultiplexerNetwork packetNetwork traffic controlThe InternetTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the tail probabilities of a multiplexer driven by /spl alpha/-stable self-similar traffic. We consider a parsimonious 4-parameter traffic model, which best captures the long range dependence and heavy-tails of aggregate packet traffic in broadband networks. Input traffic with these characteristics, induces buffer dynamics which are qualitatively different from those which arise in traditional traffic management. Using the effective bandwidth theory, we extend the recent results on /spl alpha/-stable self similar-driven queues with infinite buffer to the finite buffer case that model routers/switches more accurately. Queuing simulations with real broadband traffic emphasise the improvements in engineering considerations (e.g., connection admission control, buffer management, statistical multiplexing gains), with respect to the existing results so far. Our experiments involve a large set of real broadband network traffic which consists of Ethernet LAN, Internet WAN and MPEG-1 compressed video traces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207