MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540571363 · doi:10.4000/leportique.941

Une machine à vapeur…

2021· article· fr· W1540571363 on OpenAlex
Marylin Molinet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une machine à vapeur pour la fabrication de l'amour de l'art… C'est peut-être au travers de cette expression, utilisée par un historien d'art anglais pour caractériser la création des Kunstvereine (associations d'amateurs d'art), que l'on peut donner une image véritable de ce qui s'est produit dans le champ de l'art en Allemagne au début du 19è siècle : la mise en place d'un réseau d'associations sur l'ensemble du territoire, qui fut le socle de la création des musées, d'un marché de l'art, ainsi que de l'extraordinaire circulation des expositions, et, dans un second temps, de l'émergence de l'art moderne. Un champ expérimental dont l'un des objectifs clairement revendiqués était une Bildung (éducation) de la population, ainsi que le dépassement des barrières sociales. Une Bildung incluant l'art vivant, exigence formulée dès l'apparition des premiers romantiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it