MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540583516 · doi:10.17718/tojde.79201

REVIEW: Distance Learning Technologies: Issues, Trends and Opportunities

2004· article· en· W1540583516 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Şimşek

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Online Journal of Distance Education · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)PublishingDistance educationBiographyLibrary scienceSociologyIndex (typography)Media studiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceEngineering ethicsPublic relationsPedagogyComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This edited book is published by Idea Group Publishing. The book has sixteen chapters, in addition to an author biography and an index. Besides the editor, total of 24 authors have contributed to the book. These authors are from different countries, academic backgrounds, and institutions. Although a big majority of the authors are from USA, there are several authors from Canada and Egypt. The authors represent a variety of universities, private companies, and military institutions. Most of them have strong professional backgrounds, which help them address the issues both from theoretical and practical perspectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTurkish Online Journal of Distance EducationSame topicOnline and Blended LearningFrench-language works237,207