Molecular hydrogen and [Fe II] in Active Galactic Nuclei
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Near-infrared spectroscopy is used to study the kinematics and excitation mechanisms of H2 and [Fe ii] lines in a sample of mostly Seyfert 1 galaxies. The spectral coverage allows simultaneous observation of the JHK bands, thus eliminating the aperture and seeing effects that have usually plagued previous works. The H2 lines are unresolved in all objects in which they were detected while the [Fe ii] lines have widths implying gas velocities of up to 650 km s-1. This suggests that, very likely, the H2 and [Fe ii] emission does not originate from the same parcel of gas. Molecular H2 lines were detected in 90% of the sample, including PG objects, indicating detectable amounts of molecular material even in objects with low levels of circumnuclear starburst activity. Analysis of the observations favors thermal excitation mechanisms for the H2 lines. Indeed, in NGC 3227, Mrk 766, NGC 4051 and NGC 4151, the molecular emission is found to be purely thermal but with heating processes that vary between the objects. Thermal excitation is also confirmed by the rather similar vibrational and rotational temperatures in the objects for which data were available. [Fe ii] lines are detected in all of the sample AGN. The [Fe ii] 1.254 μm/Paβ ratio is compatible with excitation of the [Fe ii] lines by the active nucleus in most Seyfert 1 galaxies, but in Mrk 766 the ratio implies a stellar origin. A correlation between H2/Brγ and [Fe ii]/Paβ is found for our sample objects supplemented by data from the literature. The correlation of these line ratios is a useful diagnostic tool in the NIR to separate emitting line objects by their level of nuclear activity. X-ray excitation models are able to explain the observed H2 and part of the [Fe ii] emission but fail to explain the observations in Seyfert 2 galaxies. Most likely, a combination of X-ray heating, shocks driven by the radio jet and circumnuclear star formation contributes, in different proportions, to the H2 and [Fe ii] lines observed. In most of our sample objects, the [Fe ii] 1.257 μm/1.644 μm ratio is found to be 30% lower than the intrinsic value based on current atomic data. This implies either that the extinction towards the [Fe ii]-emitting clouds is very similar in most objects or there are possible inaccuracies in the A-values in the transitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".