Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une étude sur les Jeune-Canada (1932-1938) ne dépare certainement pas un numéro spécial sur la révolution tranquille. au contraire, car si on rappelle le nom de quelques animateurs du mouvement – André Laurendeau, Pierre Dansereau, Gérard Filion, Robert Charbonneau, Gérard Picard, Lucien L’Allier, Claude Robillard – on voit se dessiner la trajectoire qui va des années 1930 à la décennie 1960. Ce mouvement de jeunes, typique de la décennie de la Crise, départage un certain nombre de choses : il remet en cause la manière de l’Action catholique de la jeunesse canadienne-française (ACJC), prend des distances vis-à-vis Henri Bourassa auquel ils font peur, renoue avec l’esprit de l’enquête de L’Action française de 1921 en se plaçant à l’enseigne de l’abbé Lionel Groulx. Après un certain nombre de tâtonnements, le jeune Laurendeau y définit leur nationalisme laurentien dans un tract, Notre nationalisme (1935), qui constitue une des pièces maîtresses de la pensée politique québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".