MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1540963639 · doi:10.1029/2012gl052876

On the sunrise oscillation of the F region in the equatorial ionosphere

2012· article· en· W1540963639 on OpenAlexaff
K. M. Ambili, R. K. Choudhary

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunriseIonosondeIonosphereSunsetAltitude (triangle)PhysicsAtmospheric sciencesMorningF regionJumpGeodesyGeologyPlasmaMeteorologyGeophysicsAstronomyElectron densityGeometryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows that, contrary to previous explanations, the apparent undulating motion of the equatorial F region peak at sunrise is produced by photochemistry rather than dynamics. Our study is based on an investigation of the behavior of the early morning ionosphere observed by a Digital Ionosonde at Trivandrum, India. The phenomenon is rooted in the production of new plasma at the upper F region altitudes soon after sunrise. As the peak photoproduction rate moves down in altitude and increases in magnitude the newly formed plasma follows a similar trend. Once the density becomes large enough to be detected by an ionosonde, a jump is observed in the F region peak altitude. The jump is followed by a quick downward motion of the increasingly strong F peak. Chemistry causes the downward motion of the F peak to end near 250 km. Electrodynamics is not responsible for the sunrise undulation, but plays an indirect role in the detection of the sunrise effect by simultaneously lowering during the night the peak height and decreasing the density. When detectable, the remnant plasma introduces a lower peak height that facilitates the observation of the initial increase in peak height, while the lower background density allows the relatively small initial density increase from photoionization to be observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207