Officer Professional Education in the Canadian Forces and the Rowley Report, 1969
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the late 1960s the Canadian Military was experiencing a peacetime
 upheaval. The three previously independent Services were being
 amalgamated – unified – by political direction. This meant that previously
 independent processes, including professional education, had to be rethought
 and reorganized to fit the new single-force philosophy. Under the leadership
 of a battlefield commander, Major-General Roger Rowley, a small team set
 out to devise a radical concept for academic and professional education that
 would provide officers with a coherent suite of learning programs spanning
 their careers, all provided for by an integrated single military-civilian teaching
 engine. The plan immediately met resistance from pre-existing organizations
 and, harried by organizational reductions, faded from the scene, even as the
 value of enhanced education was receiving general support. In 2002, with a
 renewed focus on intellectual agility, the concept was resurrected with the
 establishment of the Canadian Defence Academy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".