MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541023725 · doi:10.1080/01490451.2014.920940

Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide Emissions During the Nongrowing Season from Manured Soils under Rainfed and Irrigated Conditions

2015· article· en· W1541023725 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xiying Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomicrobiology Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceManureIrrigationCarbon dioxideNitrous oxideSoil waterAgronomyGrowing seasonAnimal scienceFeedlotBiologySoil scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated CO2 and N2O emissions from soil receiving long-term cattle feedlot manure applications under rainfed and irrigated conditions in semi-arid southern Alberta, Canada. Soil available N and CO2 and N2O fluxes were measured after fall crop harvesting and prior to next spring's seeding from plots that had received 0 and 60 t ha−1yr−1 cattle feedlot manure application with (Mi0 and Mi60) or without irrigation (Mr0 and Mr60) for 27 years. Both CO2 and N2O fluxes varied considerably over the 7-month nongrowing season. Cumulative CO2 emissions from manured treatments (Mr60 at 2.20 t ha−1 and Mi60 at 2.36 t ha−1) were 2.6 times values from nonmanured treatments (Mr0 at 0.83 t ha−1 and Mi0 at 0.92 t ha−1). Similarly, cumulative N2O emission from manured treatments (Mr60 at 4.54 kg ha−1 and Mi60 at 5.34 kg ha−1) were 8–12 times values from nonmanured treatments (Mr0 at 0.40 kg ha−1 and Mi0 at 0.70 kg ha−1). Growing season irrigation had no effect on CO2 and N2O emission over the nongrowing season.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomicrobiology JournalSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207