Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author gives an account of her interview with Thérèse Bertherat. The latter is a French physiotherapist who, after an initial classical training, become discouraged by the inhuman attitudes that were common in her professional surroundings, She attended then a summer session with Françoise Mézières. There she learned to be more attentive to her own experience rather than to depend on reading or on other's experience. After a few years of professional practice, she developped new muscular activities called "préalables". These non mechanical activities are aimed at the reappropriation of one's own body. With her patients, Thérèse Bertherat discovered that the psychological realm is sometimes encapsulated into muscular rigidity. In effect, releasing these rigidities often induces the recall of a painful memory. Some patients refuse to give up the rigidities and stop the treatment at the approach of important improvement. This physio therapeutic approach is characterized by a profound respect for individual evolution. Through its main stages, it also resembles some psychotherapeutic approaches. In this context her book may be valuable to anyone who is interested in the unity of the individual.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".