Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Webcasts are an emerging technology enabled by the expanding availability and capacity of the World Wide Web. This has led to an increase in the number of lectures and academic presentations being broadcast over the Internet. Ideally, repositories of such webcasts would be used in the same manner as libraries: users could search for, retrieve, or browse through textual information. However, one major obstacle prevents webcast archives from becoming the digital equivalent of traditional libraries: information is mainly transmitted and stored in spoken form. Despite voice being currently present in all webcasts, users do not benefit from it beyond simple playback. My goal has been to exploit this information-rich resource and improve webcast users ’ experience in browsing and searching for specific information. I achieve this by combining research in Human-Computer Interaction and Automatic Speech Recognition that would ultimately see text transcripts of lectures being integrated into webcast archives. In this dissertation, I show that the usefulness of automatically-generated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it