Pôles transmédia, actions d’intermédiation et construction de liens au sein de l’industrie du multimédia des aires métropolitaines de Lille, Lyon et Marseille
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les aires métropolitaines de Lille, de Lyon et de Marseille, l’industrie du multimédia n’est quasiment pas structurée. Les entreprises ne se connaissent pas et ne collaborent pas entre elles. À la fin des années 2000, trois associations professionnelles transmédia regroupant entreprises, écoles, centres de recherche et institutions publiques, ont été lancées: Imaginove à Lyon, le Pôle Images Nord-Pas de Calais à Lille et le Pôle Régional de l’Image, du Multimédia et de l’Internet (PRIMI) à Marseille. Ces structures ont développé des actions d’animation et de médiation incitant aux collaborations, telles que la création de plates-formes emploi/formation, l’accompagnement au développement international des entreprises ou le lancement d’appels à projets collaboratifs. Les premiers résultats montrent que les entreprises commencent à coopérer avec les écoles et les laboratoires de recherche, principalement à l’échelle locale et régionale, témoignant de l’émergence de clusters du multimédia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".