MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541405882 · doi:10.1787/228683501861

Adaptation de la politique de sûreté de l'aviation aux risques

2008· paratext· fr· W1541405882 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jr. Robert W. Poole

Bibliographic record

VenueOECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre discussion papers · 2008
Typeparatext
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le rapport se structure comme suit : il commence par quelques considérations générales sur la lutte contre le terrorisme pour situer la question dans son contexte, présente ensuite un exemple provocateur de calcul, par le biais d’une l’analyse des risques, du rapport coût/efficience de plusieurs mesures prises après le 11 septembre pour sécuriser le transport aérien, compare après cela, en se fondant sur les résultats de ce calcul, la substance, les coûts et les risques des politiques de sûreté de l’aviation menées après le 11 novembre par les États-Unis, le Canada et les États membres de l’Union européenne et détaille, enfin, quelques pistes à suivre pour mieux adapter la politique de sûreté de l’aviation aux risques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre discussion papersSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207