MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541445479 · doi:10.1300/j009v24n02_02

The Forgotten Moment: Therapeutic Resiliency and Its Promotion in Social Work with Groups

2002· article· en· W1541445479 on OpenAlexaff
Tom Caplan, Harle Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Work With Groups · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychotherapistInterpersonal communicationSchematicPromotion (chess)Social psychologyAbandonment (legal)Mechanism (biology)AnxietySocial workEngineeringPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper looks at the importance of modeling attitudinal resiliency within group therapy contexts. A schematic model is presented that outlines maladaptive and resilient scenarios in response to emotionally anxiety-producing interpersonal exchanges. Maladaptive scenario focuses on the mechanism of avoidance termed the “forgotten moment.” Resilient scenario outlines exercises for clients, therapists, and supervisors that promote responsibility, intimacy and clarification through remaining present in emotionally difficult situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Work With GroupsSame topicResilience and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207