MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541445479 · doi:10.1300/j009v24n02_02

The Forgotten Moment: Therapeutic Resiliency and Its Promotion in Social Work with Groups

2002· article· en· W1541445479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Work With Groups · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicResilience and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychotherapistInterpersonal communicationSchematicPromotion (chess)Social psychologyAbandonment (legal)Mechanism (biology)AnxietySocial workEngineeringPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper looks at the importance of modeling attitudinal resiliency within group therapy contexts. A schematic model is presented that outlines maladaptive and resilient scenarios in response to emotionally anxiety-producing interpersonal exchanges. Maladaptive scenario focuses on the mechanism of avoidance termed the “forgotten moment.” Resilient scenario outlines exercises for clients, therapists, and supervisors that promote responsibility, intimacy and clarification through remaining present in emotionally difficult situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it