Bibliographic record
Abstract
Creativity per se is a convoluted phenomenon. With regard to distinct manifestations, the impact of culture on creativity is discussed. The belief system is embedded in the creative productions across different cultures. The exertion of culture on creativity is presented within a reciprocal process that, alongside culture, also weaves historical, societal, and individual factors. Further suggestions for cross-cultural studies of creativity are also discussed. Key words : Creativity; Culture; Cross-cultural studies Resume La creativite en soi est un phenomene complique. En ce qui concerne les manifestations distinctes, l’impact de la culture sur la creativite est discutee. Le systeme de croyance est ancree dans les productions creatives a travers differentes cultures. L’effort de la culture sur la creativite est presentee dans un processus reciproque qui, aux cotes de la culture, tisse egalement des facteurs historiques, sociaux et individuels. D’autres suggestions pour les etudes transculturelles de la creativite sont egalement discutes. Mots cles : La creativite; La culture; Les etudes transculturelles
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".