Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a positive integer $q$, a $k$-uniform hypergraph $X=(V,E)$ is $q$-complementary if there exists a permutation $\theta$ on $V$ such that the sets $E, E^{\theta}, E^{\theta^2},\ldots, E^{\theta^{q-1}}$ partition the set of $k$-subsets of $V$. The permutation $\theta$ is called a $q$-antimorphism of $X$. The well studied self-complementary uniform hypergraphs are 2-complementary. For an integer $n$ and a prime $p$, let $n_{(p)}=\max\{i:p^i \text{divides} n\}$. In this paper, we prove that a vertex-transitive $q$-complementary $k$-hypergraph of order $n$ exists if and only if $n^{n_{(p)}}\equiv 1 (\bmod q^{\ell+1})$ for every prime number $p$, in the case where $q$ is prime, $k = bq^\ell$ or $k=bq^{\ell}+1$ for a positive integer $b < k$, and $n\equiv 1(\bmod q^{\ell+1})$. We also find necessary conditions on the order of these structures when they are $t$-fold-transitive and $n\equiv t (\bmod q^{\ell+1})$, for $1\leq t < k$, in which case they correspond to large sets of isomorphic $t$-designs. Finally, we use group theoretic results due to Burnside and Zassenhaus to determine the complete group of automorphisms and $q$-antimorphisms of these hypergraphs in the case where they have prime order, and then use this information to write an algorithm to generate all of these objects. This work extends previous, analagous results for vertex-transitive self-complementary uniform hypergraphs due to Muzychuk, Potočnik, Šajna, and the author. These results also extend the previous work of Li and Praeger on decomposing the orbitals of a transitive permutation group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".