MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1541962686 · doi:10.1109/ihtc.2015.7238060

Solving the Last mile Problem for energy self-forming nano-grids

2015· article· en· W1541962686 on OpenAlexaff
Ben Bacque, Tanya Kirilova Gachovska, Ray Orr, Nikolay Radimov, David King Li, Shahab Poshtkouhi, Olivier Trescases

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMileLast mile (transportation)Photovoltaic systemGridTelecommunicationsTelephonyPhoneComputer scienceCapital costInvestment (military)Electric power transmissionMobile phoneElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the later part of the 1980s, the telephony industry struggled with the cost of connecting subscribers over the last mile to serve millions of people in the developing world. While the cost of switching and transmission lines is shared across hundreds or thousands of subscribers, this advantage diminishes at the edge of the network where the cost must be borne by fewer and ultimately individual subscribers. In power grids today a similar situation exists. The Last-mile Problem was resolved when the cost of cellular telephones was reduced by integrating functions and components into silicon circuits and when African entrepreneurs found novel financial models to enable even the poorest to acquire a cell phone. Using parallel principles to provide energy where the infrastructure and the required capital investment do not exist, the self-forming nano-grid project discussed in this paper can start from a single photovoltaic (PV) panel and battery each with attached inverters yet scale up to tens of kilowatts. This system also incorporates load management in a power distribution panel to set priority for load shedding to keep critical loads powered in the face of minimal generation and no conventional grid resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207