Pulsed-laser deposited LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 thin films for application in microbatteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Li Ni 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 thin films were prepared by pulsed-laser deposition at varying growth conditions. It was found that the growth and microstructure of the films is highly dependent on the target composition, deposition temperature, and the reactive atmosphere during laser ablation. The x-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopic measurements indicated the high-structural quality of the grown LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 thin films. A phase diagram mapping the effect of temperature on the microstructure of LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 thin films has been proposed. The measurements of charge-discharge profiles of Li microcells using the LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 films grown at 450°C demonstrate their possible applications in microbatteries. A stable capacity of 98μAh∕cm2μm was obtained in the potential range of 4.2–2.5V for LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 films grown at 450°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".