MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542003756 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.526406

Fuzzy detection of directions for the interpolation of images

2002· article· en· W1542003756 on OpenAlexaff
François Michaud, Chon Tam Le Dinh, G. Lachiver

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilter (signal processing)Interpolation (computer graphics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceFuzzy logicPixelComputer scienceComposite image filterMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The performance of a vertical-temporal interpolation filter can be improved if detection of contour orientation in the spatial plane of the image is used to rotate the filter spatially. With this in view the authors have developed a direction detection filter based on the principles of fuzzy logic. This filter was designed for use with a linear-phase interpolation filter having three image fields. The fuzzy filter detects the direction of contours by considering the slight variations of pixels at five considered orientations, namely 90/spl deg/, /spl plusmn/45/spl deg/ and /spl plusmn/30/spl deg/. This article presents the characteristics of the developed fuzzy filter and its detection performance. The results of its use with a vertical-temporal interpolation filter are also presented, along with the methodology followed in definition of its membership functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207