Gerald W. Creed, Masquerade and Postsocialism: Ritual and Cultural Dispossession in Bulgaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gerald W. Creed, Masquerade and Postsocialism: Ritual and Cultural Dispossession in Bulgaria (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011, Pp, xi +254, ISBN: 978-0-253-22261-9.) nation subject to much change following the end of communism in 1989, Bulgaria is a complex nation, multiple ethnicities and a vast cultural heritage that has attracted international attention. Its push to join the European Union (which it successfully did, in 2007) and become part of contemporary Western society brings to mind many concerns about Bulgarian society, including concerns for minority protection, economic stability and cultural sustainability. According to the author, anthropologist Gerald W. Creed, such modern concerns and issues can be better understood through what is, in fact, a premodern cultural practice: mumming. According to Creed, it was commonly believed that such practices would lose their relevance to many people the rise of contemporary post-socialist Bulgarian society. Yet, as his research shows, mumming is not only a growing practice in many communities, but says quite a lot about how postsocialist societies have simultaneously blossomed and floundered in various ways. well-organized structure, combined fairly accessible terminology and explanations of theoretical concepts surrounding postsocialism, allows for Creed's arguments to be understood by more than an anthropologist audience. Discussing aspects of political science, history, ethnic studies and folklore, Masquerade and Postsocialism's first major advantage is its interdisciplinary approach to examining postsocialist folk tradition. This is best seen in the introduction's examination of both postsocialist theory and ritual, the latter ofwhich is said to have risen in value due to the devaluing of many of the practices that maintained communities during the era of communism. Comparing Bulgarian mumming practices that of the practices examined by scholars such as Halpert and Glassie, the common thought of examining mumming as a locus for social drama and exchange is not only utilized as a framework for later arguments, but also placed into a historical context that demonstrates the perception of mumming as a subversive activity that was forbidden by multiple rulers. The first chapter, A Mumming Season, is best seen as a descriptive section, focusing largely on the practices that take place within community mumming and placing them into a cyclical context that demonstrates the connection of mumming to specific times of the year. In addition, the chapter also serves as a place for Creed to differentiate between the terms and festival, as well as the difference in mumming practice that comes each term. Seeing the ritual as a village-based, communal rite with supernatural overtones and rich in innovation and spontaneity, Creed compares the festival--a large-group setting in which traditional rituais were not necessarily fulfilled and often grouped together other practices during the socialist era as a promoter of nationalism--as being far removed from the traclition, yet nonetheless notable for what it says about Bulgarian history and society. issues are discussed in the second chapter, Gender and Sexuality, and a specific emphasis on the connection between mumming and masculinity takes precedence within this part of Creed's book. The role of mumming as a site of male bonding within Bulgarian communities is something that is heavily emphasized due to the connection between mumming and passages to manhood; this is examined within the context of socialist life in Bulgaria, which, along postsocialism, has been interpreted as an emasculating force in local life. Creed's explanation that socialism was responsible for challenging the political authority of men, and that postsocialism added ah economic factor to that, is well explained and provides a better context for the motivations behincl the rise of mumming in recent years, as well as the changes that have taken place in regarcls to the role ofwomen in mumming groups. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".