MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542294189 · doi:10.25071/1920-7336.22064

The Baha'fs Of Iran

2000· article· en· W1542294189 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Margaret Bremner

Bibliographic record

VenueRefuge Canada s Journal on Refuge · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsAssociation for Bahá’í Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersecutionRefugeeGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceIslamMemorandumLawEconomic growthPublic administrationHistoryArchaeologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Baha'is of Iran concerns the Iranian Baha'i situation since the Islamic revolution in lran in 1979-1980. This article begins with a brief résumé of events in 1980 and 1981 which led to the Canadian Bahra'i community becoming involved in the private sponsorship of refugees. This article then discusses the Canadian Baha'i refugee program of the 1980s, including the relationship of the Baha'i community of Canada with the Canadian government and the growth of the initially national program into one of global proportions. Reasons for the persecution of Baha'is in Iran are explained, as is the nature of the persecution. In the 1991 secret Government memorandum the Baha'i Question is noted, and details are provided regarding last autumn's raids on homes involved with the Baha'i Institute for Higher Education. The reader is then brought up to date regarding the current private sponsorship of refugees by the Bahai'i Community of Canada. This article concludes with a short comment regarding remedies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRefuge Canada s Journal on RefugeSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207