MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542297288 · doi:10.1109/wwc.2001.22

Synthetic trace generation for the Internet

2001· article· en· W1542297288 on OpenAlexaff
Weiguang Shi, M.H. MacGregor, Paweł Gburzyński

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLocalityLocality of referenceRouterThe InternetComputer networkTRACE (psycholinguistics)Network packetIP forwardingRouting (electronic design automation)Aggregate (composite)Internet trafficRouting tableRouting protocolDistributed computingCacheWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Introduction It is well established that memory reference strings of computer programs exhibit spatial and temporal locality [1]. This locality is the motivating concept behind the use of instruction and data caches, which play a critical role in improving the performance of contemporary computer systems. In this paper, we apply the concepts of locality and workload modeling originally developed for investigating program memory references to the characterization of traces of Internet traffic. Internet routers use locally-stored routing tables to look up the correct outgoing interface for each incoming IP packet, based on the best match for the destination address extracted from its header. In this sense, the destination address is the index to the routing table, just as a virtual memory address is an index to the page directories and page tables. The sequence of destination addresses in the IP packet trace constituting the input to this lookup process exhibits both temporal and spatial locality. This similarity has been exploited, e.g., in [2], to accelerate routing table lookups by harnessing for this purpose the caching hardware used by virtual address translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207