MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference on High Pressure Research, Lijiang City, Yunnan Province of China, October 16–20, 2006

2007· article· en· W1542303810 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chunxiao Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPresentation (obstetrics)High pressureLibrary sciencePolitical scienceGeographyEngineeringMedicineArchaeologyEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Third Asian Conference on High Pressure Research, ACHPR-3, was held at Lijiang City, Yunnan Province of China from October 16th–October 20th, 2006. The host organization for ACHPR-3 was the National Lab of Superhard Materials, Jilin University of China. The conference was intended to provide an international forum for high pressure researchers in the Asian countries. We wished not only to bring together researchers working on a wide range of physical properties of matter under high pressure, but also to provide an interactive environment for the exchange of new ideas. About hundred delegates from China, Japan, Korea, India, Russia, USA, France, Sweden and Canada attended the ACHPR-3. Fourteen symposia were organized for the oral and poster presentation. The symposia are listed below: Geophysical and Planetary Aspects of Pressure Effect Semiconductors and Low Dimensional Systems High Pressure Techniques Phase Transitions and Amorphizations Physical Properties of Materials Synthesis of Novel Materials Diamond and Related Superhard Materials Shock Compression and Shock Waves Shock Synthesis Energetic Materials and Detonation Hypervelocity Impact Phenomenon Equation of State Laser and matter interactions New Technologies We acknowledge the editors of Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter for agreeing to publish the selected papers as a special issue of the journal. We hope that readers will see many excellent papers in this special issue and the aim of the conference is achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1110.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207