MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542438248 · doi:10.7202/018884ar

Nostalgie à Moscou

2008· article· fr· W1542438248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicNostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article explore les formes contemporaines et émergentes de la nostalgie dans la ville de Moscou. Il examine ce thème à travers le prisme de trois espaces architecturaux qui nous parlent de la nostalgie en tant que condition culturelle et temporelle spécifique, postsocialiste : le Parc des sculptures de Moscou, la cathédrale du Christ-Sauveur reconstruite et le centre commercial de la place Manezh. J’avance que ce qui est à l’oeuvre, sur le plan politique, dans ces lieux est un certain type de dé-idéologisation qui est devenue le « nouveau style » de la Russie postsoviétique. La dé-idéologisation a tourné en norme historique, en mode affective, et j’avance que c’est précisément en raison de ce processus que « l’industrie de la nostalgie » est apparue. Cet article prend l’attachement à la nostalgie au sérieux, mais plutôt que de considérer la nostalgie comme un symptôme sur un plan analytique, mon intérêt se porte sur son examen en tant que condition historique, en tant que réponse temporelle qui apparaît à un moment particulier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1890.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.349
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it