MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neoliberalism and Health

2014· other· en· W1542448587 on OpenAlexaff
David Coburn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)CapitalismPolitical economyDemocracyDevelopment economicsEconomic inequalityLaissez-fairePower (physics)InequalitySocial policyPolitical scienceEconomicsSociologyMarket economyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neoliberalism is a market fundamentalist version of capitalism. Neoliberalism arose in the 1970s as a consequence of the rise of global corporate power. The Anglo‐American nations exemplify the more neoliberal societies. The more neoliberal of the rich nations have worse health than do the more social democratic countries. Laissez‐faire policies were enforced on poor and middle‐income countries globally. These policies had disastrous consequences for the work, family, and social life of many nations, brought frequent economic crises, and slowed down global health improvements. Neoliberal doctrines internationally have produced massive between and within nation inequalities in wealth and in health. The discipline of economics, focusing on economic growth and economic efficiency, tends to favor market‐oriented policies, while the non‐economic social sciences emphasize neoliberalism's inadequate social theory and its negative effect on population well‐being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.021
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and SocietySame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207