MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542502468 · doi:10.1109/oceans.1988.23728

Results of a Canadian shipborne radar search and rescue detection experiment

2003· article· en· W1542502468 on OpenAlexaffabout
B.R. Dawe, David P. Finlayson, D. Bryant

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsNordion (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarSearch and rescueTransponder (aeronautics)Remote sensingRadar imagingRadar lock-onCoast guardRadar systemsGuard (computer science)Computer scienceEngineeringGeologyMeteorologyMarine engineeringRadar engineering detailsTelecommunicationsGeographyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A marine radar shipborne search and rescue detection experiment was undertaken off Nova Scotia using the Canadian Coast Guard ship Sir William Alexander and US Coast Guard visual search experiment methodology. The targets were 4- and 6-man life rafts, some with 2 m/sup 2/ Luneburg lenses mounted on high-flyer buoys at a height equal to that of the canopy top of 4-man life rafts, and a small search and rescue radar transponder deployed on the ocean surface. The radar systems were the Sperry 340, the Sperry 4016, and the Raytheon Pathfinder ST radar. The number of searches and the target type varied for each radar. The sweep widths were very narrow for all but the radar transponder.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207