MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542555304

Probabilistic Models for Discriminating Road Surface Conditions Based on Friction Measurements

2008· article· en· W1542555304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Liping Fu, Feng Feng, Max S Perchanok

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 87th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoad surfaceSnowProbabilistic logicStatistical modelLogitSnow coverAggregate (composite)Environmental scienceCover (algebra)Logistic regressionField (mathematics)StatisticsMeteorologyEconometricsMathematicsEngineeringGeographyCivil engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents two statistical models for discriminating different types of road surface contaminants based on friction measurements and other road condition data. The first model is a disaggregate logit model which can be used to predict the probability that a road surface is covered by snow or in bare condition based on direct friction measurements and other available road weather data. The second model is a aggregate logit regression model that uses aggregated measures over a section of road as input to distinguish two sub snow cover states, namely, full snow cover and partial snow cover. The proposed models are calibrated using field data collected from a maintenance route in Ontario, Canada and are shown high discrimination power based on holdout data sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Board 87th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardSame topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207