Bibliographic record
Abstract
La psychanalyse s’est construite comme modèle théorique et clinique spécifique, distinct des orientations psychiatriques et neurologiques de l’époque, en se donnant comme science des origines. La question de la relation que le temps entretient avec la vie psychique est donc fondamentale, et c’est elle que nous interrogeons, d’un point de vue épistémologique. Or, au moment de la formation de la psychanalyse (1886-1896), Freud pose les termes de cette relation de façon paradoxale. D’une part, il cherche à fonder une « psychologie scientifique », à laquelle il assigne la tâche d’être une science de la nature. Mais, d’autre part, Freud confère au concept d’originaire une extension mythologique, si on entend par mythe : une histoire racontée sans avoir été vécue de faits n’appartenant pas à la réalité objective et se rapportant à un temps originaire, d’avant toute chronologie. Par là, le concept d’originaire infléchit le postulat épistémologique défini initialement, en excluant définitivement la psychanalyse du paradigme des sciences de la nature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.044 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".