Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionIn both natural and agricultural conditions, plants are frequently subjected to unfavourable environments, resulting in varying degrees of stress.UV irradiation, drought, heat shock, chilling/freezing, salinity and oxygen deficiency are a few of the major abiotic factors restricting plant growth and development.An important consequence of stratospheric ozone depletion is increased transmission of solar Ultra Violet (UV) radiation through the earth's atmosphere.This increased incidence of UV irradiation causes detrimental effects to all life forms on earth. UV irradiationThe spectrum of solar electromagnetic radiation striking the earth's atmosphere ranges from 100 nm to 1 mm.This includes the UV spectrum (100-400 nm), visible spectrum (380-780 nm) and infrared spectrum (700 nm-1 mm).The UV spectrum is further subdivided into three catogories: UV-C (100-280 nm), UV-B (280-315 nm), and UV-A (315-400 nm) (Ballaré, 2003).The shortest of these wavelengths, UV-C, is blocked completely by the ozone layer and atmospheric oxygen.In contrast, UV-A is weakly absorbed and directly transmitted to the earth's surface.Wavelengths in the UV-B range are absorbed efficiently though not completely by ozone, as a very small percentage may pass through holes in the ozone.UV-C is extremely harmful, followed by UV-B, while UV-A has milder effects (Batschauer et al., 1999). Plants and UV radiationPlants, due to their non-motile nature, generally have a higher rate of UV tolerance than animals.Plant secondary metabolites aid in defence against both abiotic and biotic stress factors.Plants are capable of reflecting or absorbing harmful UV rays via thick layers of waxy cutin or submerin on the cell walls and intracellular accumulation of chemical substances such as flavanols or phenolics.The biological effects of UV radiation on plants include altered growth responses, reproductive deformities, epigenetic variations, plant susceptibly to biotic factors, premature senescence, damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, and altered conformation of membrane structures.A wide array of genes were found to be induced upon prolonged exposure to low doses of UV-B in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Frohnmeyer & Staiger, 2003;Mackerness, 2000;Ries et al., 2000).Upregulated transcripts include: antioxidant/free radical scavenging enzymes, proteins involved in: DNA repair, translation, E3 ligase system, cell cycle, signal transduction, and secondary www.intechopen.comSelected Topics in DNA Repair 74 metabolites, as well as several other genes with unknown function (Brosché et al., 2002; Jansen et al., 2008).UV-B also results in numerous changes in plant morphology.This signalling cascade is well reviewed elsewhere (Jenkins, 2009).Here we focus on plant responses to UV-induced DNA damage. UV induced DNA damageUV-C/B radiation is directly absorbed by DNA, inducing lesions which inhibit vital cellular functions such as transcription and DNA replication.UV-A is comparatively less efficient in lesion induction but triggers the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Kunz et al., 2006).The primary UV induced DNA lesions include cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (adjacent pyrimidines covalently linked between C-5 and C-6 carbon atoms) and secondary lesions 6-4 pyrimidine-pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4 PP) (covalent linkage between the C-4 position of a pyrimidine to the C-6 position of an adjacent pyrimidine) (Fig. 1).In order to respond to this damage, plants employ specific mechanisms (Britt, 1999).In light conditions, photoreactivation catalyses dimer monomerizations while during dark conditions, Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) excises these helix-distorting lesions.Finally, residual lesions are bypassed via translesion synthesis (TLS).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".