MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542802049 · doi:10.5772/15221

Programmable Point-source Digital In-line Holography Using Digital Micro-mirror Devices

2011· book-chapter· en· W1542802049 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital holographyHolographyLine (geometry)Point (geometry)Computer scienceOpticsComputer graphics (images)PhysicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital holographic imaging techniques allow fast retrieval of three-dimensional (3-D) amplitude and phase information of an object volume through numerical reconstruction of a two-dimensional (2-D) hologram. Digital holography consists of digital sampling of a hologram on an array of charged-coupled device detectors (CCD), and digital reconstruction of the object field through a numerical algorithm [Sch94, SJ02, Yar03]. The recording process encodes 3-D information of an object into the form of interference fringes on a twodimensional recording screen. These fringes usually contain high spatial frequencies that represent the mixing between the scattered object field and coherent reference wave. A reconstruction process is performed on the recorded hologram to recover the object wave. This numerical acquisition method eliminates the need for any chemical processing of the hologram and mechanical refocusing of the reconstructed image that is commonly required in the traditional holographic imaging system [CMD99, DJL99, SPISSSW97]. This process has opened new frontiers in digital holography with emerging applications in research and industry [Kre05, SJ05]. Typically, common digital holography recording set-ups include off-axis and in-line configurations [SJ94]. Digital in-line holography (DIH) represents the simplest realization of the digital holography (DH), allowing for rapid acquisition of hologram images without the use of lenses. Recently, DIH with a spherical reference field has emerged as an attractive tool in 3D imaging of biological objects and micro-spheres without the use of lenses [GXJKJK06a, RGMNS06, XJMK02a, XJMK02b]. Basically, the configuration consists of a coherent light source – a pinhole – to generate a spherical reference field. An array of charge-coupled device detectors (CCD) provides digital sampling of a hologram. However, the characteristics and parameters of these components can affect the overall performance of the system. Among factors that limit the performance of a digital in-line holographic microscope (DIHM) are the size and spatial location of the pinhole used. These affect the resolution, obtainable field of view (FOV) and object illumination angle (which determines the projection view in the reconstructed image volume.) In [GPO08], the effect of the pinhole size on the spatial coherence of the reference beam in a DIHM system was studied. The results showed that a reduction in the coherence of the light, due to increase in the size of the pinhole used, leads to broadening of the impulse response of the system. Consequently, this limits the obtainable resolution in the reconstructed image. Other resolution-limiting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it