MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542836248

Todorov ou le moi dialogique au carrefour des cultures

2011· article· fr· W1542836248 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stoyan Atanassov

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRussian Literature and Bakhtin Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’interet de Todorov pour le dialogue est ne au debut des annees 80 sous l’influence de la pensee de Mikhail Bakhtine. Le « principe dialogique », formule par Todorov a propos du theoricien russe, est une notion complexe qu’il convient d’envisager a plusieurs niveaux : la parole de tout etre humain, l’intertextualite, les differentes formes discursives a l’interieur du roman, genre dialogique par excellence. A partir de ce « pandialogisme », Todorov opte aussi pour une « critique dialogique ». Celle-ci se caracterise par le souci de parvenir a un echange et a un equilibre entre la parole du critique et celle de l’auteur du texte commente. Notre expose se propose d’analyser les possibilites et les limites de cette critique dialogique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicRussian Literature and Bakhtin StudiesFrench-language works237,207