MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P4-15-08: A phase 1b study of ONT-380, an oral HER2-specific inhibitor, combined with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2015· article· en· W1542863370 on OpenAlexaff
Virginia F. Borges, Erika Hamilton, Denise A. Yardley, Jorge Chaves, Nathalie Aucoin, Cristiano Ferrario, Luke Walker, Ian E. Krop

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalLa Cité Médicale
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLapatinibMedicineTaxaneTrastuzumabMetastatic breast cancerInternal medicineNeratinibOncologyTrastuzumab emtansineProgressive diseaseAnthracyclineCancerBreast cancerPharmacologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: ONT-380 (also known as ARRY-380) is a potent, selective small molecule inhibitor of HER2 with 500-fold selectivity compared to EGFR. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic activity with ONT-380 and chemotherapy or trastuzumab, as well as superior activity compared to lapatinib and neratinib in models of HER2+ CNS metastases. In a Phase 1 single agent study in HER2+ MBC, ONT-380 was well tolerated and provided clinical benefit with minimal EGFR-type toxicities, with an MTD of 600 mg BID using an API-in-capsule formulation. Based on the potential for dual blockade of HER2 to lead to clinical benefit, ONT-380 is being evaluated in combination with T-DM1 in patients previously treated with a taxane and trastuzumab for metastatic disease. Methods: This 3+3 dose escalation study evaluates escalating doses of ONT-380 in a new tablet formulation combined with T-DM1 at 3.6 mg/kg IV once every 21 days. Prior treatment with trastuzumab and a taxane are required. Prior lapatinib or neratinib therapy and asymptomatic brain metastases (treated or untreated) are allowed. Previous T-DM1 is not permitted. Normal left ventricular ejection fraction and anthracycline exposure ≤ 360 mg/m2 is required. Study assessments include safety, ONT-380 and T-DM1 PK, tumor response by RECIST 1.1, and CNS response by both modified RECIST and volumetric criteria. Dose escalation will be followed by enrollment of expansion cohorts in patients with and without CNS disease. Results: As of 21 May 2014, 7 patients have been treated with ONT-380 at 300 mg BID for 1–5 cycles. One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 3 ALT/AST elevation was seen in the ONT-380 300 mg BID cohort, requiring a dose reduction for both agents with subsequent cohort expansion to 6 patients. No further DLTs have been seen in this cohort, and no other dose reductions have been required. Most toxicities have been Grade 1 or 2, with the most common regardless of attribution being nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, and thrombocytopenia. Two Grade 3 AEs have been reported, including the DLT of ALT/AST elevation, and one event of thrombocytopenia, considered related to T-DM1 but not ONT-380. There has been no Grade 3 diarrhea and no SAEs. In the four patients evaluable for response to date, best response has been 1PR, 2 SD, and 1 PD. Three patients with prior CNS radiation have had continued reduction in CNS lesions on study. Initial PK data indicate greater ONT-380 exposure is achieved with the new tablet formulation compared to the earlier capsule formulation with no evidence of drug interaction with T-DM1. Conclusions: Treatment with ONT-380 and T-DM1 has been associated with an acceptable safety profile, with only one DLT and minimal Grade 3 toxicity, including no Grade 3 diarrhea or rash. Early evidence of disease control has been seen, including in patients with CNS metastases. Dose escalation continues, and updated results will be presented for additional cohorts. Citation Format: Virginia F Borges, Erika Hamilton, Denise A Yardley, Jorge Chaves, Nathalie Aucoin, Cristiano Ferrario, Luke Walker, Ian Krop. A phase 1b study of ONT-380, an oral HER2-specific inhibitor, combined with ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207