MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1542968237

El rompimiento de los espejos identitarios en Centroamérica: estudio de caso literario de un discurso migrante obsesivo: El asco, Thomas Bernhard en San Salvador, del salvadoreño Horacio Castellanos Moya

2011· article· es· W1542968237 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Albino Chacón Gutiérrez

Bibliographic record

VenueÍSTMICA. Revista de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El asco es un extenso monologo de Edgardo Vega, emigrante salvadoreno recien llegado de Canada, que tiene por interlocutor a Moya (?el mismo Horacio Castellanos Moya, sujeto de la escucha y de la escritura?). Novela ausente de cualquier nostalgia identitaria, en ella el protagonista migrante desconstruye su relacion primigenia, mediante un rechazo que funciona como sintoma de una nueva inscripcion espacial. Por una parte, rechazo a lo que no se puede dejar de ser, de ahi el rechazo de si mismo y de su historia; por otra, adhesion al deseo imposible de ser algo distinto a lo que hasta ahora habia sido. ?Resultado? La identidad, que algunos podrian considerar como consubstancial a un origen, a un territorio o a unos objetos que actuan como signos de pertenencia a un grupo, deviene una estructura cambiante, productora de un discurso cuya finalidad obsesiva de distanciamiento, de desidentidad, se convierte en un movimiento esquizofrenico propio de las sociedades perifericas neocoloniales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.007
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÍSTMICA. Revista de la Facultad de Filosofía y LetrasSame topicLatin American Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207