MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543243296

The Knowledge Factory: Innovation and IT Investment in Manufacturing

2007· article· en· W1543243296 on OpenAlexaff
Landon Kleis, Paul Chwelos, Ronald Ramírez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)Industrial organizationProductivityProduction (economics)Value propositionDual (grammatical number)Factory (object-oriented programming)Value (mathematics)Order (exchange)Process (computing)BusinessValue captureKnowledge managementStructural equation modelingValue creationComputer scienceMarketingEconomicsMicroeconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IT business value research has identified a dual role of IT investment: to increase the firm’s productivity by improving or replacing other inputs, and to reshape intermediate value-creation processes. Innovation is one such process that has been recognised as critically important. This paper incorporates the innovation process in a model of overall production to estimate the effect of IT in these two roles. We analyze a database of large US manufacturing firms using structural equation techniques in order to assess the fit of our model. Our findings show an indirect contribution of IT, through the innovation process, that varies markedly across industries. Additional analyses are required to capture longitudinal aspects of the data, but the initial findings confirm the longstanding proposition that IT creates value at intermediate stages of production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207