Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Edmund Leach (1910-1989): Achievements 2. Childhood and youth 3. Apprenticeship and the Second World War 4. The anthropologist at work: teacher and theorist 5. The Political Systems of Highland Burma 6. The Frontiers of Burma 7. Pul Eliya: the challenge to the descent group theory 8. Hydraulic Society in Ceylon: contesting Wittfogel's thesis and Sri Lankan mytho-history 9. The engagement with structuralism 10. The comparativist stance: us and them 11. The Structural Analysis of Biblical Narratives (with illustrations) 12. Anthropology of art and architecture (with illustrations) 13. Individuals, social persons and masquerade 14. Leach and Levi Strauss: similarities and differences 15. A Runaway World? 16. British anthropology and colonialism: challenge and response 17. Retrospective assessment and rethinking anthropology 18. The work of sustaining institutions 19. Retirement, retrospection and final illness Bibliography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".