MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543468844 · doi:10.4153/cmb-2008-062-6

Summation of Series over Bourget Functions

2008· article· en· W1543468844 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mirjana V. Vidanović, Slobodan B. Tričković, Miomir S. Stanković

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Mathematical Bulletin · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsBessel functionSeries (stratigraphy)GeneralizationDirichlet seriesOrder (exchange)Pure mathematicsInteger (computer science)Dirichlet distributionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we derive formulas for summation of series involving J. Bourget's generalization of Bessel functions of integer order, as well as the analogous generalizations by H. M. Srivastava. These series are expressed in terms of the Riemann ζ function and Dirichlet functions η, λ, β, and can be brought into closed form in certain cases, which means that the infinite series are represented by finite sums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Mathematical BulletinSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207