MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543512301 · doi:10.4000/rh19.271

Éric PIERRE et Marie-Sylvie DUPONT-BOUCHAT [dir.], Enfance et justice au XIXe siècle. Essais d'histoire comparée de la protection de l'enfance (1820-1914). France, Belgique, Pays-Bas, Canada, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 2001, 443 p.

2001· article· fr· W1543512301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Élise Yvorel

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enfance et justice au XIXe siècle est l'aboutissement d'un projet ambitieux qui se propose d'étudier les prémices et les évolutions des politiques de protection de l'enfance de 1820 à 1914 en France, en Belgique, aux Pays-Bas et au Québec. Plus précisément, il s'agit de faire un panorama et une analyse de celles qui incluent une participation de la justice, que ce soit sous le sceau de la protection ou sous celui de la correction. L'originalité de l'idée réside dans la volonté de faire une ét...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207