MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543512301 · doi:10.4000/rh19.271

Éric PIERRE et Marie-Sylvie DUPONT-BOUCHAT [dir.], Enfance et justice au XIXe siècle. Essais d'histoire comparée de la protection de l'enfance (1820-1914). France, Belgique, Pays-Bas, Canada, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 2001, 443 p.

2001· article· fr· W1543512301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Élise Yvorel

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Policies and Family
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enfance et justice au XIXe siècle est l'aboutissement d'un projet ambitieux qui se propose d'étudier les prémices et les évolutions des politiques de protection de l'enfance de 1820 à 1914 en France, en Belgique, aux Pays-Bas et au Québec. Plus précisément, il s'agit de faire un panorama et une analyse de celles qui incluent une participation de la justice, que ce soit sous le sceau de la protection ou sous celui de la correction. L'originalité de l'idée réside dans la volonté de faire une ét...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.007
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)Same topicSocial Policies and FamilyFrench-language works237,207