A unique guild of Lepidoptera associated with the glacial relict populations of Labrador tea (Ledum palustre Linnaeus, 1753) in Central European peatlands (Insecta: Lepidoptera)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La comunidad local muy específica de nueve tirfobiónticos (especialistas en la turba) y ocho especies tirfófilas (que prefieren la turba) de polillas (16 especies) y sólo una especie de mariposa tirfobióntica (Lepidoptera) relacionadas con el té de Labrador (Ledum palustre Linnaeus, 1753) constituye un fenómeno único de las turberas en la frontera sur fragmentaria de la zona boreal en Europa Central. 19 especies son tirfoneutrales en una adaptación ecológica amplia. La composición de tirfobiontes y tirfófilos parece ser un ejemplo modélico de especies de Lepidoptera de las turberas glaciales relictas y su planta nutricia subártica adaptada al frío. Una comunidad similar se conoce en biotopos de tundra subárctica solamente. Esta comunidad de polillas y mariposas, que se encuentra solamente en algunas turbas relictas aisladas, es determinada y protegida por un microclima único de Sphagnum las turberas post-glaciales/Holoceno (“Trampa climática”) y las plantas nutricis muy específicas adaptadas al frío (fríos relictos) representada por el té de Labrador. Todas las turberas antiguas aisladas con Ledum palustre y sus Lepidoptera necesitan protección completa del medio ambiente y de hábitat con especial respeto a las condiciones de hidrológicas y una observación urgente de su comunidad glaciar de insectos bajo un impacto de un posible cambio climático.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".