MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543635792

Chemical stability of fentanyl in polypropylene syringes and polyvinylchloride bags.

2015· article· en· W1543635792 on OpenAlexaff
Ronald F Donnelly

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypropyleneFentanylChromatographyChemistryChemical stabilityAnesthesiaOrganic chemistryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fentanyl is a potent synthetic lipophilic opiate agonist used to control pain as a single agent or in combination with local anesthetics. The chemical stability of the undiluted commercial solution (50 micrograms/mL) in polypropylene syringes or polyvinylchloride bags has never been reported. Undiluted fentanyl solution, 50 micrograms/mL, was aseptically transferred to polypropylene syringes or polyvinylchloride bags. Samples were then stored, either at 5 deg C and protected from light, or at 22 deg C and exposed to light, for 28 days. A stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatographic method was used to monitor the fentanyl concentration of the samples. Color, clarity, and pH also were monitored. After storage for 28 days, there were no signs of chemical degradation of fentanyl packaged in either polypropylene syringes or polyvinylchloride bags at either 5 deg C or 22 deg C. All solutions remained colorless and clear over the course of the study. The pH did not change significantly after storage for 28 days. Fentanyl solutions, when packaged undiluted in polypropylene syringes or polyvinylchloride bags, are chemically stable for 28 days when stored either at 5 deg C and protected from light or at 22 deg C and exposed to light.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207