MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543663219 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.528156

Simulation of delay and crosstalk in high speed VLSI interconnects

2002· article· en· W1543663219 on OpenAlexaff
Ramachandra Achar, Roni Khazaka, R. W. Griffith, M. Nakhla, Q.J. Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVery-large-scale integrationElectronic engineeringComputer scienceCrosstalkInterconnectionSignal integrityEmbedded systemEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulation of delay and cross-talk in VLSI interconnects is becoming important in high speed systems designs. However, the conventional circuit simulation involving dispersive system of VLSI interconnects is extremely CPU expensive. Several accurate and efficient methods based on, (1) numerical inversion of Laplace transform (NILT) and (2) complex frequency hopping (CFH) for the simulation of VLSI interconnects are discussed. Also, the extension of moment matching techniques for the case of interconnects with frequency dependent distributed models or full wave models has been presented. The proposed techniques ore useful for the accurate and efficient transient simulation involving high speed interconnects in MCMs, PCBs, VLSI chip packaging and high speed systems design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207