MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1543714600

"It's missing": damn you , Missing Person and the Material History of the Postcolonial Poem

2015· article· en· W1543714600 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emma Bird

Bibliographic record

VenuePostcolonial text · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessMateriality (auditing)PoetryNarrativeTRACE (psycholinguistics)LiteratureReading (process)Context (archaeology)HistoryOrder (exchange)ArtAestheticsLinguisticsPhilosophyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter examines the history of modern Indian poetry in English, paying particular attention to the poets and contexts that have no prominent place in its better known narratives. I begin by reflecting on little magazines, using the experimental damn you as a case study in order to trace the varied influences on poets in the 1960s. I then introduce a close reading of the sequence Missing Person by Adil Jussawalla, showing that this text bears witness to the circumstances of its own production. The little magazine and the individual poem demand an attentiveness to materiality and history, enriching a critical understanding of a literary canon and its context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostcolonial textSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207