Identification, characterization and expression of a receptor for the unusual myosuppressin in the blood‐feeding bug, <i> <scp>R</scp> hodnius prolixus </i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myosuppressins are a family of the FMRFamide-like peptides. They have been characterized in many insects and shown to inhibit visceral muscle contraction. Rhodnius prolixus possesses an unusual myosuppressin in that the typical FLRFamide C-terminal motif is unique and ends with FMRFamide. In the present study, we isolated the cDNA sequence for the R. prolixus receptor for this unusual myosuppressin (RhoprMSR). Quantitative PCR indicates high relative transcript expression of RhoprMSR in the central nervous system and also supports the previously described physiological effects of RhoprMS on the digestive system, with expression of the RhoprMSR transcript in the midgut and hindgut. Expression of the RhoprMSR transcript was also found in the female and male reproductive system of 5th instar nymphs, with transcript expression greater in the female reproductive tissues. No expression was found in the salivary glands or Malpighian tubules. A functional receptor expression assay confirmed that the cloned RhoprMSR is indeed activated by RhoprMS (half maximum effective concentration = 42.7 nM). Structure-activity studies based upon both functional receptor assays and physiological assays showed the importance of the HVFMRFamide moiety, as further N-terminal truncation removed all activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".