MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1544174880 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v60i1.139

Évaluation du contrôle de la douleur ainsi que de la satisfaction du personnel infirmier et des mères à la suite de l'implantation d'un programme d'automédication en obstétrique

2007· article· fr· W1544174880 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Manon Arpin, Geneviève Goulet, F. Dee Goldberg, Régis Vaillancourt

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePain managementGynecologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background: The Montfort Hospital in Ottawa found that obstetric patients were waiting too long to receive pain relief medications. This represented a significant gap in care. Objectives: To evaluate the implementation of a self-medication program in obstetrics, the degree of pain relief experienced by women using self-medication, and nurses’ and mothers’ satisfaction with the program by means of a survey. Method: In this descriptive study, nurses’ compliance with 12 practice criteria in the self-medication protocol was assessed over a 4-week period (May 30 to June 26, 2005). To determine the extent of patients’ pain relief, the severity of each patient’s pain was measured before and after self-administration of ibuprofen and/or acetaminophen doses, and averages were determined. A 7-question telephone survey was administered to some mothers, and a 3-question written survey was administered to some nurses. Results: One hundred and forty-seven charts were reviewed. One hundred and twenty-eight (87%) of the mothers participated in the self-medication program. After 4 weeks, the mean compliance rate for 10 of the practice criteria was 84%. After 9 days of data collection, important gaps from the selfmedication program were noted, and a memo was sent to the nursing staff to improve on 4 points. Eighty-nine percent (n = 75) of women obtained pain relief from ibuprofen alone, compared to 85% (n = 69) with acetaminophen alone and 87% (n = 49) with both medications. No clinically significant difference was observed between the 2 medications (p = 0.42, t test). Of the 35 mothers and 15 nurses who were surveyed, 94% and 100%, respectively, appreciated the self-medication program. Conclusion: With a mean compliance rate above 80%, this project was considered a success. More than 85% of mothers obtained appropriate relief with the medication offered in the program, which indicates that the empowerment conferred by the self-medication program meets the needs of a high proportion of mothers. RESUME Historique : L’hopital Montfort a Ottawa a mis le doigt sur une lacune importante dans ses soins, soit un delai d’attente trop long avant l’administration de medicaments a sa clientele obstetrique. Objectifs : Evaluer la mise en application d’un programme d’automedication en obstetrique, evaluer le degre de soulagement des femmes par la prise autonome de medicaments, puis evaluer, au moyen d’un sondage, le degre de satisfaction du personnel infirmier et des meres. Methode : Une etude descriptive d’une duree de quatre semaines (du 30 mai au 26 juin 2005) a evalue la conformite de la pratique du personnel infirmier quant a 12 criteres distincts inscrits au protocole d’automedication. Pour determiner le degre de soulagement de la douleur des patientes, nous avons effectue, pour chaque patiente, une compilation des mesures moyennes de l’intensite de la douleur avant et apres la prise de la dose d’ibuprofene et/ou d’acetaminophene. Un sondage telephonique comportant sept questions et un sondage ecrit comportant trois questions ont ete respectivement effectues aupres de certaines meres et infirmieres. Resultats : Cent quarante-sept dossiers medicaux ont ete revises. Cent vingt-huit (87 %) des meres ont participe au Programme d’automedication. Apres quatre semaines, un taux de conformite moyen de 84 % a ete obtenu pour 10 criteres etudies. Apres neuf jours de collecte de donnees, on a note des ecarts importants par rapport au Programme d’automedication, et une note de service a ete envoyee au personnel infirmier afin d’ameliorer quatre points. Quatre-vingt-neuf pour cent (n = 75) des femmes ont obtenu un soulagement avec l’absorption d’ibuprofene seul, contre 85 % (n = 69) avec l’acetaminophene seul, et 87 % (n = 49) avec les deux medicaments combines. Aucune difference cliniquement significative n’a ete detectee entre ces deux medicaments (p = 0,42, test de t). Des 35 meres contactees, 94 % ont apprecie le Programme d’automedication et 100 % des 15 infirmieres ayant repondu au sondage. Conclusion : Le taux de conformite moyen etant superieur a 80 %, ce projet est considere comme une reussite. Plus de 85 % des meres ont obtenu un soulagement approprie avec la medication offerte dans le Programme, ce qui demontre que l’autonomie ainsi accordee repond au besoin d’une forte proportion de meres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→French-language works237,207→