MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544242885 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2002.1009926

A MEMS socket system for high density SoC interconnection

2003· article· en· W1544242885 on OpenAlexafffund
Sazzadur Chowdhury, Majid Ahmadi, G.A. Jullien, William C. Miller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicroelectromechanical systemsInterconnectionDie (integrated circuit)Contact resistanceCMOSCantileverElectrical contactsBridge (graph theory)EngineeringElectrical engineeringMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringLayer (electronics)Mechanical engineeringStructural engineeringOptoelectronicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design of a microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) socket system to enable the temporary high density interconnection of a CMOS die to a System-on-Chip (SoC) implementation of a tester is described. Connectivity is achieved with a fixed MEMS socket that is thermosonically bonded to a CMOS tester die and a carrier MEMS socket that acts as a custom die-specific removable insert for the fixed socket to easily interface the die being tested to the SoC based tester. A new cantilevered bridge-type microspring contact provides direct connectivity to the I/O pads of the die under test. The bridge-type contact spring geometry has excellent elastic properties and features a contact resistance of 19.3 m/spl Omega/ at a contact force of 1.35 mN. The MEMS socket system was designed and simulated using IntelliSuite CAD tools and fabrication arrangements are being pursued.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207