MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544307618 · doi:10.1054/bjoc.1999.0984

Evidence of a founder BRCA1 mutation in Scotland

2000· article· en· W1544307618 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alexander Liede, Brian Cohen, D M Black, Rosemarie Davidson, Andrew Renwick, Elizabeth Hoodfar, O. I. Olopade, Mark A. Micek, Vernon Anderson, R De Mey, Alison Fordyce, Ellen Warner, Jamie L. Dann, Barbara Weber, Steven A. Narod, C. M. Steel

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Cancer · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of TorontoOccupational Cancer Research CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreCancer Care Ontario
FundersUniversity of St AndrewsMedical Research CouncilNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsFounder effectHaplotypeGenealogyMutationEthnic groupGeneticsPopulationDemographyGenotypeBreast cancerMedicineGeographyBiologyCancerHistoryAnthropologyGeneSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BRCA1 mutations have been identified in breast and ovarian cancer families from diverse ethnic backgrounds. We studied 17 different families with the BRCA1 2800delAA mutation; seven were ascertained in Scotland (Dundee, Edinburgh, Glasgow, St Andrews), five in Canada (Toronto, Victoria) and five in the United States (Chicago, Philadelphia, Seattle). Overall there was a clear preponderance of Scottish ancestry. Genotype analysis performed on key members from 17 families was consistent with a common haplotype, strongly suggesting a single ancestral origin. A possible link was established between two families by tracing their genealogies through the records of the Registrar General for Scotland. This is the first example of a BRCA1 mutation likely to be derived from a common founder in Scotland. Further studies will be necessary to estimate more accurately the population frequency of the BRCA1 2800delAA mutation among unselected cases of breast and ovarian cancer in Scotland and the UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of CancerSame topicBRCA gene mutations in cancerFrench-language works237,207