MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544324168

Incorporación de TICs de modelado molecular en la enseñanza universitaria de la Química

2012· article· es· W1544324168 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Victorio A. Marzocchi, Alicia Vilchez, Miguel D'Amato

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldComputer Science
TopicE-Learning and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisualizationAnimationEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceInformaticsCurriculumQuarter (Canadian coin)Subject (documents)Computer graphics (images)MultimediaEngineeringWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligencePsychologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se informan logros alcanzados en la incorporación de TICs de visualización y modelado molecular en el inicio de carreras de grado de la Facultad de Ingeniería Química, UNL. A partir de 2008 desarrollamos una serie de actividades: promovimos la instalación de doble booteo en los gabinetes informáticos, seleccionamos e instalamos software libre de visualización y modelado molecular, dictamos un ciclo de charlas y realizamos talleres para estudiantes y docentes. Estas actividades iniciales lograron despertar un imprescindible interés y generar el involucramiento y compromiso de docentes que permitieron proponer y respaldar actualizaciones curriculares que incluyen estas TICs tanto en asignaturas optativas como del tercio inicial. La modificación curricular más importante es la realizada en la asignatura Informática que se dicta para los ingresantes de todas las carreras de la FIQ. En el primer cuatrimestre de 2011 se incluyó el Gabedit, interfaz gráfica con un avanzado constructor de moléculas, y en el primer cuatrimestre de 2012 se amplió al Jmol que permite animación con visión estereoscópica usando lentes 3D anaglifo. Estos logros configuran un hecho de alto impacto en todas las actividades de docencia, que potenciará diversas iniciativas de actualización, perfeccionamiento, aplicación y desarrollo con estas herramientas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicE-Learning and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207