MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544424269 · doi:10.1109/aps.1998.690836

Performances of projection iterative method on electromagnetic scattering by spheres

2002· article· en· W1544424269 on OpenAlexaff
Qiubo Ye, L. Shafai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIterative methodComputational electromagneticsElectromagneticsScattering-matrix methodProjection (relational algebra)Convergence (economics)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceMethod of moments (probability theory)Decomposition method (queueing theory)Matrix (chemical analysis)Projection methodIntegral equationScatteringMathematical optimizationMathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisMaxwell's equationsElectromagnetic fieldDykstra's projection algorithmPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to solve large electromagnetic scattering problems with less computer memory and less execution time, iterative based numerical methods have been sought for the matrix equation obtained by the method of moments (MoM). A projection iterative method (PIM) is a convergence guaranteed method which has not been widely applied in electromagnetics. In this method, the solution is improved by means of an orthographic projection procedure. The decomposition technique is that the unknowns are not decomposed in space. A series of sub-equations defined on subdomains are solved in each iterative step. The computer memory is much less than that of the direct method for the original equation when the sub-equation size is small. Therefore it is potentially applicable to large electromagnetic problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207