MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544453937 · doi:10.3233/978-1-58603-891-5-811

An Activity Recognition Model for Alzheimer's Patients: Extension of the COACH Task Guidance System

2008· book-chapter· en· W1544453937 on OpenAlexaff
Bruno Bouchard, Patrice Roy, Abdenour Bouzouane, Sylvain Giroux, Alex Mihailidis

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of TorontoUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtension (predicate logic)Task (project management)Computer sciencePsychologyNeuroscienceSpeech recognitionEngineeringProgramming languageSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a hybrid plan recognition model, based on probabilistic description logic, which addresses the issue of recognizing the activities and the errors of Alzheimer's patients at an early stage of the disease. This model has been implemented to be a new extension of the COACH system, an emerging prototype of cognitive device for persons with Alzheimer's disease that offers assistance in task completion. We present an initial experimentation done on this new recognition module for COACH, which is based on the results of two sets of clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applicationsSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207