MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544687194

Speak Clearly into the Chandelier: Cultural Politics between Britain and Russia 1973-2000

2000· article· en· W1544687194 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
J. Dingley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdventureMemoirPoliticsPeriod (music)Soviet unionHistoryEconomic historyPolitical scienceLawMedia studiesClassicsArt historySociologyArtAesthetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John C.Q. Roberts. Speak Clearly into the Chandelier: Cultural Politics Between Britain and Russia 1973-2000. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press, 2000. xiii, 272 pp. This is a somewhat ramshackle memoir chronicling many of the events that befell the author during his stint as Director of the Great Britain-USSR Association from 1973 to 1993, with a few subsequent incidents up to 2000. In 1992, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Great Britain-USSR Association was, apparently, split in two and renamed as both the Britain-Russia Centre and the British East-West Centre. John Roberts deals with this awkward renaming in Chapter Fourteen, but I am still unclear about exactly why these two organizations emerged out of just one predecessor. Today the two organizations share a homepage, i.e. http://www.briteastwest.org.uk/. Speak Clearly into the Chandelier (henceforth: Chandelier) is, in many ways, an intriguing read. It gives us glimpses into the goings-on of many of the literati, politicians, movers-and-shakers in both the Soviet Union and in Britain during the period 1973-1993. It affords us a nostalgic trip back into the days of the Cold War, when merely to visit the USSR was at once an adventure and a novelty. Roberts probably believes that his book expands, first and foremost, our knowledge of the machinations of the Soviet apparat (a word he much favours!), but, for me, by far the more illuminating aspect of Chandelier is what it tells us about British society during this period. It tells us volumes. It is important to understand just why the Britain-USSR Association was established in the first place. Following British Prime Minister Macmillan's visit to the Soviet Union in 1959, it was decided that the British needed a new organization to encourage informal British-Soviet contacts in the Arts. Just who took this decision is never made clear. This new organization would not be susceptible to influence or take-over by communists or fellow-travellers (p. 7). Other such organizations already in existence, especially the British-Soviet Friendship Society, were deemed to be hopelessly pro-Soviet and not interested at all in putting over the British point of view. The first Chairman of the Britain-USSR Association was the British war-hero Sir Fitzroy Maclean, upon whom Ian Fleming is said to have modeled James Bond. And then in 1973 Roberts was plucked from his post as Russian teacher at Marlborough College (an elite British Public School) to become the Association's second Director, succeeding Major-General Thomas B. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207