Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’un des aspects les plus intéressants du nationalisme québécois depuis les années 1960 est son ancrage à gauche. Comparé aux nationalismes flamand et catalan, par exemple, le nationalisme québécois est le plus souvent associé aux politiques égalitaristes d’inspiration sociale-démocrate. Bien qu’il existe une faction néolibérale au sein du mouvement indépendantiste, le nationalisme québécois semble inséparable de l’idée que le Québec forme une « société distincte » non seulement en raison de sa langue et de sa culture, mais également en raison de son modèle économique et social. L’objectif de cet article est d’expliquer et d’illustrer cet ancrage à gauche du nationalisme québécois dans le champ des politiques économiques et sociales depuis les années 1960. Centré sur le Québec, mais incluant une discussion d’autres cas, l’article met l’accent sur les rapports entre les acteurs, les idées économiques et les institutions politiques, notamment les partis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".