MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1544802895

Structural Equation Models in IS Theory and Measurement

2009· article· en· W1544802895 on OpenAlexaff
Jöerg Evermann

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association for Information Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural equation modelingComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is taking on an increasingly important role in the examination of theory and measurement issues in information systems. Despite its popular use and the many software packages that exist for the researcher, SEM is a complex technique that provides may pitfalls for the unaware researcher. This workshop provides a gentle introduction to SEM from basic principles. It also covers some of the advanced issues that the researcher might encounter, not only from a statistical but also, and more importantly, from an ontological and epistemological perspective. The workshop is targeted at PhD students and IS researchers new to SEM and little to no statistical knowledge. Demonstrations and hands-on examples make use of the open source R system for statistical computing, which will be provided to all participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association for Information SystemsSame topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207